Juniper Networks Unveils Junos Pulse AppConnect to Deliver Simple Per-App Mobile Security From Application to Enterprise

SUNNYVALE, CA--(Marketwired - Dec 4, 2013) -  Juniper Networks (NYSE: JNPR), the industry leader in network innovation, today unveiled Junos® Pulse AppConnect software development kit (SDK) that enables per-application virtual private network (VPN) connectivity from both Apple iOS and Google Android devices to Juniper's Junos Pulse Secure Access Service.

Businesses are facing increasing demands from employees for easy access to corporate data and business applications from any device and anywhere. These demands make ensuring the proper level of security and access to information challenging for IT departments. As companies and government organizations are opening up access to sensitive data to a wider diversity of personal and corporate owned mobile devices, many are struggling to balance security with flexibility. It is imperative that they find ways to provide a level of control over Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) while not burdening end users with security that impairs productivity.

News Highlights:

Junos Pulse AppConnect - Junos Pulse AppConnect technology and SDK is the first solution to offer per-application SSL VPN connections on both Android and Apple iOS mobile devices. With AppConnect, enterprises will have more granular control over access to corporate networks and applications, preserving the security and integrity of their data, network and resources end-to-end. Application and data containerization on the device is a popular approach to MDM for companies that want to segment work and personal data on the device. However, this segmentation is often not extended to network communications. AppConnect enables companies, developers and application container solution providers, to secure data flowing from applications and application containers to enterprise networks through Junos Pulse Secure Access Service Gateways. Data privacy afforded by the container technology in AppConnect can be extended to the data in transit back to the corporate network -- transparently and on a per-application basis -- for Android and Apple iOS devices. The potential for corporate data leakage via applications on personally owned devices is subsequently greatly reduced. Juniper's new technology allows for VPN sessions to be established per application versus per device, reducing personal traffic on corporate networks and protecting information that really matters to the organization. For users, AppConnect relieves employee concerns that personal data is flowing over the corporate network and makes it much easier to connect. Users no longer need to launch a separate application to connect to the corporate network securely via VPN; Applications and application containers connect automatically to the private network. The Junos Pulse AppConnect SDK is generally available next week.

Supporting Quotes:

"We believe the VPN market is undergoing a transition from securing devices to securing applications end-to-end. Juniper's vision is that every user will securely and transparently access only authorized corporate data from any device (personal or company owned) through applications from anywhere," said Tamir Hardof, senior director security product marketing, Juniper Networks. "With AppConnect's per-application VPN technology Juniper is taking significant steps toward realizing this vision."

Additional Resources:

About Juniper Networks in Security
Juniper Networks builds secure and trusted networks with end-to-end security across every environment -- from the data center to campus and branch environments and to the device itself. Our security solutions give enterprise and service provider customers a competitive advantage as they set out to build the best networks on the planet.

About Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks (NYSE: JNPR) delivers innovation across routing, switching and security. From the network core down to consumer devices, Juniper Networks' innovations in software, silicon and systems transform the experience and economics of networking. Additional information can be found at Juniper Networks (www.juniper.net) or connect with Juniper on Twitter and Facebook.

Juniper Networks and Junos are registered trademarks of Juniper Networks, Inc. in the United States and other countries. The Juniper Networks and Junos logo are trademarks of Juniper Networks, Inc. All other trademarks, service marks, registered trademarks, or registered service marks are the property of their respective owners.

View the original article here

Read more »

About the security content of iTunes 10.7

WebKit

Available for: Windows 7, Vista, XP SP2 or later

Impact: Visiting a maliciously crafted website may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution

Description: Multiple memory corruption issues existed in WebKit. These issues are addressed through improved memory handling.

CVE-ID

CVE-2011-3016 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3021 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3027 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3032 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3034 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3035 : wushi of team509 working with iDefense VCP, Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3036 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3037 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3038 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3039 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3040 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3041 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3042 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3043 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3044 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3050 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3053 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3059 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3060 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3064 : Atte Kettunen of OUSPG

CVE-2011-3068 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3069 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3071 : pa_kt working with HP's Zero Day Initiative

CVE-2011-3073 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3074 : Slawomir Blazek

CVE-2011-3075 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3076 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3078 : Martin Barbella of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2011-3081 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3086 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3089 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team, miaubiz

CVE-2011-3090 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3105 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3913 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3924 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3926 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3958 : miaubiz

CVE-2011-3966 : Aki Helin of OUSPG

CVE-2011-3968 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3969 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2011-3971 : Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2012-0682 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-0683 : Dave Mandelin of Mozilla

CVE-2012-1520 : Martin Barbella of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer, Jose A. Vazquez of spa-s3c.blogspot.com working with iDefense VCP

CVE-2012-1521 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team, Jose A. Vazquez of spa-s3c.blogspot.com working with iDefense VCP

CVE-2012-2817 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-2818 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-2829 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-2831 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-2842 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-2843 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-3589 : Dave Mandelin of Mozilla

CVE-2012-3590 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3591 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3592 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3593 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3594 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-3595 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security

CVE-2012-3596 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3597 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3598 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3599 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3600 : David Levin of the Chromium development community

CVE-2012-3601 : Martin Barbella of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3602 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-3603 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3604 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3605 : Cris Neckar of the Google Chrome Security team

CVE-2012-3606 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3607 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3608 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3609 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3610 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3611 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3612 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3613 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3614 : Yong Li of Research In Motion, Inc.

CVE-2012-3615 : Stephen Chenney of the Chromium development community

CVE-2012-3616 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3617 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3618 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3620 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3621 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3622 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3623 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3624 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3625 : Skylined of Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3626 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3627 : Skylined and Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security team

CVE-2012-3628 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3629 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3630 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3631 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3632 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3633 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3634 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3635 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3636 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3637 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3638 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3639 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3640 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-3641 : Slawomir Blazek

CVE-2012-3642 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-3643 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3644 : miaubiz

CVE-2012-3645 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3646 : Julien Chaffraix of the Chromium development community, Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3647 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3648 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3649 : Dominic Cooney of Google and Martin Barbella of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3651 : Abhishek Arya and Martin Barbella of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3652 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3653 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3654 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3655 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3656 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3657 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3658 : Apple

CVE-2012-3659 : Mario Gomes of netfuzzer.blogspot.com, Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3660 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3661 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3663 : Skylined of Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3664 : Thomas Sepez of the Chromium development community

CVE-2012-3665 : Martin Barbella of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3666 : Apple

CVE-2012-3667 : Trevor Squires of propaneapp.com

CVE-2012-3668 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3669 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3670 : Abhishek Arya of Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer, Arthur Gerkis

CVE-2012-3671 : Skylined and Martin Barbella of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3672 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3673 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3674 : Skylined of Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3675 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3676 : Julien Chaffraix of the Chromium development community

CVE-2012-3677 : Apple

CVE-2012-3678 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3679 : Chris Leary of Mozilla

CVE-2012-3680 : Skylined of Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3681 : Apple

CVE-2012-3682 : Adam Barth of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3683 : wushi of team509 working with iDefense VCP

CVE-2012-3684 : kuzzcc

CVE-2012-3685 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3686 : Robin Cao of Torch Mobile (Beijing)

CVE-2012-3687 : kuzzcc

CVE-2012-3688 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3692 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team, Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3699 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3700 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3701 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3702 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3703 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3704 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3705 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3706 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3707 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

CVE-2012-3708 : Apple

CVE-2012-3709 : Apple Product Security

CVE-2012-3710 : James Robinson of Google

CVE-2012-3711 : Skylined of the Google Chrome Security Team

CVE-2012-3712 : Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team using AddressSanitizer

View the original article here

Read more »

About the security content of iTunes 10.6.3

About the security content of iTunes 10.6.3This document describes the security content of iTunes 10.6.3.

">ACUtil.setPOD('us~en'); var articleId = "HT5318"; var ACStaticText = { 'more': '…more', 'less': 'less' };KmLoader.akamaiUrl = 'http://km.support.apple.com';//function sendRead()var locale = 'en_US';Event.observe(window, 'load', function() {ACHistory.addKbView('HT5318', 'About the security content of iTunes 10.6.3', 'en_US', 'unknown');ACUtil.getMultipleOffers('133014,PP23', 'HOWTO_ARTICLES', 'en_US', 'false');ACUtil.reportView('HT5318', 'en_US');// Apple Instant Feed statistics code if(enableAppleInstant == "yes"){var store = new Persist.Store('FeedStats');if (store.get('resultActivity')=='true'){var time = new Date();// Fix for /*setReadTimer = setTimeout(function(){var feedStats = new ACFeedStatistics();feedStats.updateRead('HT5318', store.get('position'));store.remove('HT5318');store.remove('position');}, 3000);*///store.set('HT5318', time.getTime());store.set('timeStart', time.getTime());}} });Event.observe(window, 'beforeunload', function(){// Apple Instant Feed statistics code if(enableAppleInstant == "yes"){ var store = new Persist.Store('FeedStats'); if (store.get('resultActivity')=='true' && store.get('timeStart') !== null){ var time = new Date();//var timeDiff = time.getTime() - store.get('HT5318');var timeDiff = time.getTime() - store.get('timeStart');var timeSpent = Math.floor(timeDiff/1000);var feedStats = new ACFeedStatistics();// Fix for if (timeDiff About the security content of iTunes 10.6.3 Summary

This document describes the security content of iTunes 10.6.3.

Products Affected

Product Security, iTunes 10

For the protection of our customers, Apple does not disclose, discuss, or confirm security issues until a full investigation has occurred and any necessary patches or releases are available. To learn more about Apple Product Security, see the Apple Product Security website.

For information about the Apple Product Security PGP Key, see "How to use the Apple Product Security PGP Key."

Where possible, CVE IDs are used to reference the vulnerabilities for further information.

To learn about other Security Updates, see "Apple Security Updates".

iTunes 10.6.3

iTunes

Available for: Mac OS X v10.5.8 or later, Windows 7, Vista, XP SP2 or later

Impact: Importing a maliciously crafted .m3u playlist may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution

Description: A heap buffer overflow existed in the handling of .m3u playlists.

CVE-ID

CVE-2012-0677 : Gjoko Krstic of Zero Science Lab

WebKit

Available for: Windows 7, Vista, XP SP2 or later

Impact: Visiting a maliciously crafted website may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution

Description: A memory corruption issue existed in WebKit.

CVE-ID

CVE-2012-0672 : Adam Barth and Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team

$('articlecontent').select('img').each(function(element) { if(element.width > 640 ){ var imageDiv = document.createElement('div'); imageDiv.setStyle({ 'display':'block', 'width':'660px', 'overflow':'auto', 'border':'1px solid #dedede','margin-right': '15px'}); element.parentNode.replaceChild(imageDiv, element); imageDiv.appendChild(element); } }); $('articlecontent').select('table').each(function(element) { if(element.width > 660 || element.offsetWidth>660){ var tableDiv = document.createElement('div'); tableDiv.setAttribute("class","kbtablecontainer"); element.setAttribute("style","margin-bottom:0px !important"); element.parentNode.replaceChild(tableDiv, element); tableDiv.appendChild(element); } }); Important: Mention of third-party websites and products is for informational purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation. Apple assumes no responsibility with regard to the selection, performance or use of information or products found at third-party websites. Apple provides this only as a convenience to our users. Apple has not tested the information found on these sites and makes no representations regarding its accuracy or reliability. There are risks inherent in the use of any information or products found on the Internet, and Apple assumes no responsibility in this regard. Please understand that a third-party site is independent from Apple and that Apple has no control over the content on that website. Please contact the vendor for additional information. Rate this article:Not helpfulSomewhat helpfulHelpfulVery helpfulSolved my problemOne Moment PleaseThanks for rating this article Not helpful Somewhat helpful Helpful Very helpful Solved my problem

View the original article here

Read more »

The Mailbox security failure that wasn’t

The Mailbox security failure that wasn’t | iMore.com Skip to main content Android BlackBerry iPhone / iPad Windows Phone webOS SIGN UP|LOG IN iMore Forums Apps Games Accessories Reviews How-To Podcasts Contests iPhone iPad mini iPad iPod touch Apple TV iOS iCloud iTunes Mac Hot: iPhone 5S Guides: iPhone buyers | iPad buyers | iOS users Free: Wallpaper | iPhone apps, games | iPad apps, games Shop Online Cases Chargers Screen protectors Headsets & More Free shipping on orders over $50 The Mailbox security failure that wasn’t By Nick Arnott, Monday, Apr 29, 2013 a 9:38 pm 3

A few days ago it was reported that the popular Mailbox app was falling short on protecting user data. Developer Subhransu Behera published a post on his blog outlining what he considered to be security failures on the part of Mailbox.

Using iExplorer, Subhransu was able to extract the SQLite database out of Mailbox and view its contents, which consisted of all of the contact information and emails from the app. The conclusion to the article was the belief that Mailbox needs to be doing more to secure this user data, specifically by employing methods in the iOS SDK which would prevent being able to access this data with tools like iExplorer. After being posted on Hacker News, a number of people reported trouble reproducing Subhransu’s results.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen confusion about this sort of thing. Not too long ago there was a lot of fuss about an iOS lock screen bypass bug that exposed the device’s filesystem. It turned out that claim wasn’t at all accurate. The cause of confusion over that lock screen bypass may be the same source of the confusion here.

When you plug your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch into your computer for the first time, the device will exchange keys with the computer that allow the two devices to talk to each other. If you have a passcode on your device the first time you plug it into your computer, iTunes will give you an alert message saying you need to enter your passcode on the device first. This is because the device’s contents are encrypted and iTunes (or any other app for that matter) has no way to read the contents of the device. Once you enter your passcode, your device and computer can exchange keys as mentioned above and only then are they able to start communicating. These keys mean that even if the device is locked in the future, if you plug it into that same computer, iTunes (along with other apps) can still communicate with the device.

This can cause some confusion when somebody plugs a locked device into a computer it has previously been plugged in to. The misconception is that because a locked device is plugged into a computer and the contents of the device are readable, that the contents of that device would be readable on any computer that the device is plugged in to; but this is not reality. If you were to lose your phone on the street, then somebody else picked it up, took it home, plugged it into their computer and fired up iExplorer, they would just see a screen telling them to plug in a device. iExplorer has no way to talk to that device until the device has been unlocked, plugged into the computer, and the keys have been exchanged. You can reproduce this behavior on a computer that the device has already been plugged into by going to the '/private/var/db/lockdown' directory on the computer ('%AllUsersProfile%\Apple\Lockdown\' in Windows) and deleting the plist file in that directory that has your device’s UDID in the filename.

This of course raises the question of what about a device that doesn’t have a passcode? While it’s true that somebody could copy the SQLite database off in that scenario, it’s also true that the person could just launch the Mailbox app and view the same information in the app itself. Mailbox could provide a little extra protection by encrypting the locally stored database. This would provide an extra level of protection for users so that in the event that an attacker momentarily had access to an unlocked device, they could not just copy the database off, allowing them to take their time looking through it later. However, it’s debatable if not having such a protection qualifies as a security fail. And it’s certainly questionable if it warrants deleting the app off of you device as Subhransu did. Especially in a case where you’ve trusted a 3rd party service with accessing your email accounts and storing your email on their servers in the first place.

Not to mention that Gmail’s own iPhone app stores cached email in pretty much the same way.

Nick Arnott

Security editor, breaker of things, and caffeine savant. Writes on neglectedpotential.com about QA & security, and as @noir on Twitter about nothing in particular.

More Posts

 

8 7 92 0 More of: Featured, News
More of: Security, mailbox ? PreviouslyMicrosoft makes Windows Phone commercial, sells iPhone instead Next up ?Horizon Calendar review: Check the weather at the location of your next appointment There are 3 comments. Add yours. asuperstarr says: Apr 30, 2013 at 6:43 pm - 10 hours ago

Glad I decided against this app!

Reply Allyson Kazmucha says: Apr 30, 2013 at 8:53 pm - 8 hours ago

Did you even read the article?

Reply subhransu says: Apr 30, 2013 at 11:29 pm - 5 hours ago

@Nick, there's another interesting fact behind this though. Some people choose to enable for passcode after few minutes (http://i.imgur.com/A9TR486.png). This is different than the normal lock screen. lock screen just turns of the display of your phone. so if passcode is not set to be enabled immediately (let's say it's being set to 15 mins) ... within that period data can be extracted from a device using iExplorer or similar tools. It's definitely true one can read emails directly on the app if device is not locked, but reading emails vs copying contents (including contacts, attachments) etc are two different things.

Reply Contact iMoreSEND US NEWS  |  SUBMIT AN APP

Follow iMore(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=213678485361751"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Follow @iMore!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");


Facebook
Twitter
Google+
RSS
YouTube
iTunes Shop iMore

THE #1 ACCESSORY STORE | 2 MILLION+ ORDERS SHIPPED

Browse All Accessories Cases and Skins Chargers Cradles Bluetooth Headsets Screen Protectors See all accessories Browse Accessories For Your Phone iPhone 5 Cases Chargers Car Kits & more iPhone 4S Cases Chargers Car Kits & more The new iPad Cases Chargers Screen Care & more iPhone 4 Cases Chargers Car Kits & more iPad 2 Cases Chargers Screen Care & more iPhone 3GS Cases Chargers Car Kits & more Shop iMore

THE #1 ACCESSORY STORE | 2 MILLION+ ORDERS SHIPPED

View All Devices STORE AD CONTENT Download iMoreiMORE APP  |  iMORE FORUMS  |  MOBILE NATIONS

Watch iMoreMORE SHOWS  |  MORE VIDEOS

Tell iMore Team iMore
Rene
Georgia
Leanna
Chris
Ally
Simon
Chris
Michelle
ABOUT iMORE

Wear iMoreORDER YOUR T-SHIRTS NOW!

Mobile Nations YouTube Channel Follow Us on Twitter Join us on Facebook Mobile Nations RSS Feed 13,102,764 Readers Per Month Mobile Nations brings you the very best of Android Central,
CrackBerry, iMore, webOS Nation, and WPCentral   Easyjet app update brings mobile boarding passes and Passbook supportThor 2: The Dark World hits theaters this fall, but you can get lots of great Thor stuff from iTunes right nowBlackBerry CEO supposedly says dumb things about the future of tablets, but what are the smart things?Currency for iPhone review: Convert between currencies on the goFeed Wrangler aims to make you forget about Google Reader, make RSS easier with Smart Streams, filters, and more   HTC dropping HTC Watch support for 6 countries in Europe come May 31Google I/O 2013 session schedule now availableMadfinger Games bringing titles to OUYA, Moga and Gamestick this yearGoogle releases Glass intro video to help us all get startedMophie announces Juice Pack for the HTC One, on sale now for $99.95 I highly doubt Thorsten Heins thinks the tablet market will dieTELUS BlackBerry Q10 unboxingLinkedIn v2.2 for BlackBerry OS smartphones brings BBM integration and company pagesPopcornFlix arrives for BlackBerry 10 - Watch free movies on your BlackBerry smartphoneBlackBerry Q10 and the Mercedes AMG Petronas car team up in the latest round of promo videos IM+ gets bumped for Windows Phone 8 & Indigo gets some minor improvements tooApply even more cool effects to images with the new Nightshot filter in Nokia's #2InstaWithLoveBoth Tumblr and NBC News updated, anything new?A behind the scenes look at the "Don't fight. Switch" Windows Phone adAT&T is giving you at least $100 for your old smartphone App Giveaway: Othello StockWatchLast call! Verizon Pre3 60-second video entries close tomorrowMonday Brief: WWDC sells out, BlackBerry Q10 review and the Samsung Galaxy S4 has arrivedPhoenix teams up with OpenMobile to Kickstart the ACL for TouchPadIsis Web doesn't bring new WebKit to the TouchPad, but it's still betterThis is the WindsorNot - the webOS slate smartphone that never was   iPhone / iPad ForumsAndroid ForumsBlackBerry ForumsWindows Phone ForumswebOS Forums Copyright 2013 Mobile Nations ? Terms and Conditions ? Privacy Policy

View the original article here

Read more »